SHAFIQUE AHMED QURESHI versus HYDERABAD CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY
Section 42 and 54 Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984), Section 42 and 177 Business Organizations Ordinance (XLIX of 2009), Sections 1 (3) and 35 (a) Declaration and Order Prohibition Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Voter List Elections The Corporate and Associate Class dispute was related to the holding of elections in the Chamber of Commerce and Industry and the inclusion of voters in the corporate class and the Associate Class plea raised by the plaintiffs when the elections were stopped by the High Court, when the ordinance of the companies In view of section 177 of 1984, the previous arrangement will continue till the next election, the ordinance of the companies will be issued under section 177 of 1984. In granting the validity, the dispute was not directly applicable or to Germany when once the High Court declared the Chamber of Commerce and Industry related to holding elections, it meant that the status quo needed to be maintained. Establishment of ad hoc committee was not a lawful process during the intervention period and was decided between e-corporate and associate class members if extraordinary general meeting is called and ad hoc committee appointment will not be taken advantage of. Not only will the situation be complicated but it will be more helpful to delay the election process. The Chamber's committee will continue to hold its positions until the next election and will not terminate / cancel the membership of a member, nor have any new members directed the High Court to the Executive Committee to hold an extraordinary general meeting of its members (e. GM) specify for up to 21 days. In accordance with the Articles of the Meeting and the Articles of the Agenda, all the members exchanged in the notice to decide the majority of the members on the articles of the Association.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
