MUHAMMAD AMIN QURESHI versus STATE
Section 9 (a) (xii) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application bail, approval of interim qualification of accused along with its accompanying accused, provisional review of proof of proof required component misused bank's cashier. Huge money was deposited in the form of utility bills from two different departments. The accused persons were officers of the respective departments and were alleged to have been linked to the cashier's abuse, as they allegedly failed to collect scrolls and stubs from the bank. , Which was a form of humor, the presence of a guilty mind was essential. The extradition by the accused with their guilty mind was essential, which required at least some information about the crime, to show that the accused knew. Without knowing Nishu, the accused's telephonic contact with the cashier misused my calier. Concerning the conversation, it cannot be assumed that he knew of the cashier's misconduct in the absence of the offender's mind, failure to collect scrolls and food, even if they were mentioned in illegal money. Even so, criminal liability does not attract what was temporarily up to the High Court to see that the prosecution has failed to understand the reasonable grounds for the accused to prove the crime and to further investigate his guilt. Need
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Fateh Pur lawyer