MUHAMMAD HANIF THROUGH ATTORNEY versus KARACHI BUILDING CONTROL AUTHORITY THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE
Sections 6 (2) and 7A Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 High Court Appellant, who was the buyer of some shops in the building constructed by the defendants, dismissed the appellants as a single High Court judge. Frustrated by the order. Section 7A of the Sindh Buildings Control Ordinance, 1979, requests for interim relief to prevent the authority from proceeding, in violation of the plan approved the purchase or occupation shops were constructed by the applicants and the respondents building authorities Can't value its move to remove objects. The record was available to show that the appellants seized the relevant shops only after the possession certificate under the provisions of section 6 (2) of the Sindh Buildings Control Ordinance, 1979, the appellant was not an innocent buyer of the shops. For this reason, these errors can be processed. Respondent appellant could not obtain better rights than his predecessor and in any case when he chose to buy the property more than 20 years ago without confirming compliance with the requirements of the law, he was guilty only Can be \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
