Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ILYAS versus STATE

Articles 4 324, 3 353, 5 Pro Code and V 34 Criminal Code (v. 1898), the statements of the 342 accused were not properly recorded as they were not allegedly recovered from their own possession. They were indicative of the circumstances of the case. The fact that the accused was prejudiced against the accused in the trial, was the proper and legal way to deal with the criminal case under section 342, CRPC, to record the statements of the accused. The court should first discuss the prosecution's case / evidence so that it can independently seek the authenticity of the witnesses' testimony, especially the testimony of the witnesses and the probability of the story being narrated, and then under section 2342, C.R. Examine the accused's statement. If the statement is made under section with40 ((????)), the PC, if the statement under Section 2342, CRPC was exempt, the accused should be acquitted, and if the same as a whole was considered. And if he is convicted of an offense under the law, then the accused should be sentenced so that the trial will be given to the trial court so that he can be convicted under Section 342, Cr. Proceed to the recording phase and then hear the parties and to decide the case according to the law. \ R \ n immigration advocates phone number from Mangal Sada lawyer