Find a Lawyer

DAWAR KHAN versus STATE

The accused, along with two other co-accused, were arrested in connection with the section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), section 324/353/34 bail, permanent delay in the case; No fines were secured, nor was anyone behind the jail bars for more than a year in the alleged encounter with a person on both sides, but that did not result in the fact that all the witnesses were police officers. And it was submitted by the accused that the bail was granted to the two accused. The prosecution was that instead of approving the bail, directing the trial to expedite the proceedings could be of no consequence as it was justified to proceed with the case as soon as possible. The prosecution did not look serious at the hearing. The trial court denied the trial court's decree for any note, in lieu of abusive behavior shown to the accused by police bail but for malicious conduct, regarding a false bail order, and / or the ground of co-accused's bail. It appears that the accused had taken bail in his plea for bail, his refusal to bail the accused was in violation of the principle of consistency and the code of conduct against him. The conditions guaranteed smooth and even delivery of justice law websites from Fateh Jang lawyer