MUHAMMAD FAROOQ KHAN versus STATE
Police arrested 3 people and arrested 25 kg of marijuana during the section 497 Narcotic Material Stances Control Act (XXV of 1997), section 9 (c) and 51 bail, grant of further investigation, a temporary review of the evidence. Exported to During the interrogation, the place was defaced, the suspect was arrested on the basis of the apology indictment, which was neither presented as a prosecution witness nor the accused was included in the identification test. The prosecution's contention was that bail under section 51 of the Narcotic Substances Act 1997 cannot be guaranteed. The suspects should be allowed, as a large quantity of narcotics was recovered. The litigation had no such weight. The quantity can be valued only if it was attached to the accused by the cash evidence contained in Section 51 of the Controlled Drugs Act, 1997 under the Drugs Act. It will be attracted when there is reasonable grounds to believe that the accused was guilty of the crime. The high court was capable of bail in the appropriate rules, even though Section 51 of the Drug Control Act 1997 Despite the provisions of the CBI, there is no reasonable basis for the perpetrators to prove the crime, and further investigation into the crime of the accused is required in this case, bail has been granted. In the circumstances of the accused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Sambrial lawyer