Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE versus MST. GUL TAJ

The dissolution of the marriage on the basis of Section 5, Schedule and Section 12 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Section 42, where it was assumed that the spouse could not co-exist within the limits set by God. Then, the wife who had to terminate the marriage had to be dissolved following the instruction of the wife who claimed to return the benefits which she had received from her husband. The main purpose and the purpose of the marriage was between the spouses. Was the creation of a perfect and happy life that could only be mutual. Love and love and their boundaries were observed by God. If this was not possible and the basic purpose of marriage was defeated, then the husband had to dissolve the marriage, in the present case, the court stated that he should stay with her. Ready for any wife on any terms and conditions that he liked but he clearly refused and was not willing to live with her at any cost. The wife had developed extreme hatred. His wife, upon inspection, had dismissed that if the husband was willing to provide her with all the facilities he sought, he would still have her. Ah was not willing to stay and she was not willing to be with her husband even if he had to do it, such hatred of wife expressed intense hatred in his mind and it could be easily said. She was not willing to live with her husband at any cost, thus the relations between the spouses were so strained that they could not live together. God had, in the limits set by the courts, rightly come to the conclusion that reconciliation between spouses immigration advocates phone number from Faisalabad lawyer