Find a Lawyer

ARSHAD MAHMOOD versus PUNJAB COOPERATIVE BOARD FOR LIQUIDATION, LAHORE THROUGH CHAIRMAN

Section 11 Constitutional Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 114 Retention of the application against interim / inter-provincial orders The Accounting Board filed a case against two defendants for passing the award, which the Judicial Officer named as a defendant / former defendant. Awards were granted against the party while the other defendant / applicant was discharged from all liability The request for leave to proceed was allowed, the case was remanded and the awards were placed through an interfaith order. Which was not challenged by the applicant in front of the higher forum but instead he gave Filed application was rejected legitimate grounds. The applicant said that when the order for separation of awards was approved but the applicant stated that the order was not challenged, hence it has been finalized and the applicant has to complete each interim / 14-month period. The international act was stopped or stopped. The decision of the Cooperative Board and the Judicial Officer could not be summoned under section 11 of the Punjab Undesired Cooperative Societies (Resolution) Act, 1993 under the question. divorce advocates from Pindi Bhattian lawyer