MST. AYESHA SIDDIQUA versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER
Section 491 Habitat Corps petitioner petitioned for the recovery of two minors who were minors of minors who appeared in court and presented minors to the court, alleging that the applicants / minors' mother, They were divorced by the applicant was living a life of immorality. Applicant could not be satisfied how and under what law, he had custody of minors in maternity relations, claiming that he was deprived without knowing the allegations made by the applicant's former mother. Is. , The High Court avoided jurisdiction under section 491, CR PC, so that the applicant could approach the Guardian Judge for the execution of his order.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Pindi Bhattian lawyer
