Find a Lawyer

STATE versus MUHAMMAD SARWAR

Definition of Section 302 (b) of the evidence was promptly filed with the FIR, which listed the accused as an accused, who fired at both the deceased, as well as the names of the prosecution witnesses I was listed, though both the prosecution witnesses were closely related to the victim. But the close relationship simply had no basis for declaring them as interested witnesses, because the accused was too closely linked to the prosecution's witnesses, saying the witnesses had no serious animosity or ill-intention to trap the accused in this case. If there was an accused, then the prosecution witnesses were natural witnesses in the same area where the resident of the same mansion where the incident occurred and they explained their presence, the witnesses were subjected to a lengthy investigation. That eyewitnesses are reliable and trustworthy. In the light of the lantern, the question of misidentification of the accused did not arise as it was formerly known as a close relative of the prosecution witnesses, which was sufficient to link the accused alone. He repeatedly fired at the victim, who later died of the same shooting, and then pursued another victim and killed him. His ocular account was confirmed by medical evidence, but the accused had 30 bore pistols. Recovery was alleged to have been recovered by chance, but that alone was not enough to punish the accused, Otherwise, I had also admitted to commissioning my own licensed pistol. In various ways the accused responds to requests for self-esteem, self-defense and sudden outrage criminal advocate from Bahawalpur lawyer