NABI BUX versus STATE
Section 77 FF (vi) / evidence 34 Definition of evidence The benefit of the suspect did not cause the injured person (two of three) to be injured by the eyewitness who was present at the scene with the victim at the time of the alleged incident. The prosecution's witnesses were close together and the identity of the victims' personal interest and illegal witnesses cannot be relied upon without independent source evidence, and in the present case, it is stated that the witnesses were not verified by any independent source. One of the prosecuting witnesses did not disqualify the seat, the injuries sustained by the accused did not depend on when a major If witnesses were not believed to have committed the crime, then it cannot be relied on to prosecute the person against the second (third) accused. It is suspected that the trial court acquitted the accused on the basis of the commission of the murder of the deceased on the basis of the same evidence which states that under Section 337F (v) the accused cannot be convicted. The PC accused were acquitted, giving them the benefit of the doubt.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Khanqah Sharif lawyer