Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RIZWAN versus STATE

Section 497 (5) of the Contempt of Claims (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 bail, the application for a deep appreciation of the evidence filed by the accused under the pre-trial trial hearing was dismissed in the High Court, The trial court directed the prosecution to record statements of witnesses within two months. The accused filed another bail plea before the trial court, then after recording the statements of the complainant and the three witnesses, the plea allowed by the applicant was that the trial court had deepened. After the arrest, the bail was granted. Defending the evidence, the trial court re-examined and examined the merits of the case, which was not available to the accused, while the trial court took advantage of the delay in recording the statements of eyewitnesses by the investigating officer. And expressed contradictions in the medical evidence. The trial court exceeded the statutory thresholds, as such findings could only be recorded after the trial trial trial court transferred the evidence widely, which was not guaranteed at the bail-out stage, Because it was beyond the scope of section 497, the CCP Trial Court held that the defendants violated the law-abiding principles and thus did not exercise discretion. In a just and fair manner and the bail was given in a fake and crooked manner, the bail was canceled under the circumstances. criminal advocate from Madinah lawyer