Find a Lawyer

MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. versus FATEH MUHAMMAD SHAH

Sections 46, 47 (3) and 48 (3) of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968); Was dismissed and the charge against the respondents investigating was that he had misappropriated the cash deposited for the credit in the customer - the carrier filed against the plaintiff against his dismissal order. According to the complaint request, he was reinstated by the Labor Court. The evidence on the fullback benefits record proved that the defendant was not in league with the cashier so that the money could be misused, but even though this was not proven against the defendant, the element of corruption by him There was one who actually allocated the wrong amount was removed from the service The defendant was not treated completely out of the board, keeping in mind that the appellant was a banking company that had the public money. Deal with Where a minor error would cause great harm to the appellant bank and cause serious embarrassment, the respondent cannot be held guilty and cannot be restored to the wrongful order passed by the Labor Court, whereby the reply The veterans were restored to the job with full back benefits. By setting aside and dismissing the defendant, the mandatory retirement penalty can be met with the end of justice as the respondent will be able to receive his / her retirement and pension benefits from the appellant bank. \ R \ n \ r \ n property advocates from Khanewal lawyer