Find a Lawyer

PANDOK versus KHODA IQBAL

Articles & 63 and Spec 64 Special Relief Act (of 1877), Sections 42 and 54 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 115 suit for declaration and illegal injunction restraining trial case, although passing through the parties' requests Later, the parties settled the matter but no matter was made regarding the revival of section 63 of the Quetta Balochistan Tenancy Act 1978, the following courts were also mistaken for considering the law related to the dispute, The plaintiff's contents clearly indicate that the defendants have filed a lawsuit. On the basis that the tenants were not paying their right to e-mail and sought to evict their property, which was exclusively under the jurisdiction of the Revenue Court established under the Balochistan Tenancy Act, 1978 Arrivals, without considering any legal proposals, proceeded illegally, with this case, decisions / orders exercised by the amended jurisdiction were without the jurisdiction of the High Court. Anne, based on false assumptions of facts, open error of law and arbitrary use of powers, interferes with the conclusions of the courts and puts aside unneeded decisions / orders. The judge was instructed to return the case to the defendants for submission to the Revenue Court, which has jurisdiction over the matter. solicitors from Usta Mohammad lawyer