MIR KHALID LANGOV versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INTERIOR, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD
Sections 2 and 3 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition to be named on the Examination Control List Petitioner was challenged in validating the constitutional request of the notification under which it was named on the Exit Control List, No reason, whatever was mentioned in the above notification under section 2 of section 2 of the Pakistan (Control) Ordinance 1981, (3), it was not necessary to explain the basis of the government. If it is not in the public interest, but as guaranteed by the Constitution, the freedom of the citizen. After this was prevented, the federal government had a legal obligation to use its power under section 2 (3) of Section 2 of the Exit Pakistan (Control) Ordinance, 1981. Apparently, the federal government was legally obliged to demand a court. To satisfy the court's conscience and to show that this material is on the Exit Control List by record. An election of the Federal Government's Standing Council on the instability of a constitutional application without the provision of a review available under section 3 of the Pakistan (Control) Ordinance 1981 was not considered a color, given the fact that the naming The applicant's application was not reported to the applicant in the Exit Control List and was not disclosed in the unknown notification. What was needed was to enable the applicant to take advantage of the review process and in the absence of it, it was neither appropriate nor feasible for the applicant to take advantage of the constitutional application of the review. , Apply in such circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Tibba Sultanpur lawyer