Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HADI versus FAREEDA KHANUM

Article 5 and Schedule Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 120 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application suit for the recovery of articles, Family Court respondents' family within 3 years of her husband's death The case was filed in court. In the dowry articles, the petitioner, the deceased husband's father, filed a petition for dismissal / rejection of the defendant which the defendant has withheld over time and has stated that the application was dismissed as a requirement of jurisdiction. The case was filed by the defendant after the verdict was passed by the Family Court. A constitutional petition was filed against the Family Court jurisdictional decision where no threshold was set for filing a case for the recovery of Daisy's articles. The provisions of Article 20, the Limitation Act, 1908, which apply for a period of six years for filing a lawsuit in this case, shall apply, but when the claim was for a particular movable property or for compensation for wrongful possession, the period The period was three years from the day when the demand for withdrawal of articles was refused. And, seizing it, the articles became an illegal case filed by the defendants within three years, not punishable with time before the West Pakistan Family Court Act, 1964, sued for the recovery of the articles of dowry. Amended, there is no doubt that it was to be set up in civil court, but under the Family Laws (Amendment) Act (VII of 1997) under the Act, such matters are either pending or their institution. A special trial was prosecuted by the Family Court suit, in which case, the defendant rightfully called the family best law firm from Chicha watni lawyer