Find a Lawyer

MST. GHAFOORAN versus MUHAMMAD BASHIR

Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), suit for specific performance of section 115 contract, the plaintiff filed a claim 18 years after the execution of the litigation agreement. Sale agreement was executed. In favor of the plaintiffs in favor of the plaintiffs, the defendants denied the execution of the alleged sale agreement to Burden so that the execution of the agreement would prove that he was the plaintiff, but he could not produce any witnesses to prove it. In addition to a single limber for, another plaintiff claimed that there were modest witnesses to the deal. , Was dead, but the defendants made no attempt to prove the testimony by the witnesses, who died, even the limberman who was alive, was not presented by the defendants in the absence of any minor witness and the defendant. Other evidence failed to confirm the alleged sale agreement in the failure of the plaintiffs, failing to exclude the evidence placed on them, the suit could not be ordered against the defendants and an improper injunction in favor of the defendants. For the reasons present with the courts below, filed by the plaintiffs fully compensate the inadmissible suit Also, it was excluded in its entirety. divorce advocates from Khangarh lawyer