MUKHTAR HUSSAIN versus STATE
Article 199 Exploratory Regulation (XLV of 1860), Articles 420, 468 and 471 Constitutional application to dismiss the FIR allegations contained in the unidentified FIR, which relates to the scope of the factual dispute, to investigate the contentious questions. Holdings are required, the applicants refused. Such an exercise could not be implemented by the High Court in proceedings under Article 199 of the Constitution. The FIR was still under investigation and it was under the legal obligation of the police to investigate the crime mentioned above and such. In the initial phase, the police will have to interfere with the legal duty. The termination of the FIR on litigation would be equivalent to the usual routine of law provided under the CRPC, and under police rules it has been alleged that more than one alternative remedy is available under the CRPC. There is no chance of interference by the High Court in this matter. The FIR was excluded for termination
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Chohar Jamali lawyer
