JAY RAM versus STATE
Sections 324, 337a (i), (ii) and (iii), 337c, 337e (i) and (vi) benefit from the doubt of the evidence Victim suffered 38 injuries to his body, it was impossible for him Had his father been on the spot to protect his son from the attackers, he would not have intervened. After the daily light incident in the market, the independent witnesses could have been picked up by the prosecution, but that was not done in this case, the prosecution had, without any doubt, failed to prosecute the accused, The benefit of the doubt was extended. The sentence sentenced to trial by the trial court was set aside
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Patoki lawyer