Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

AYOOB versus STATE


Section 6 436 Definition of evidence The complainant's evidence was not substantiated nor did the prosecutor's testimony confirm it. Do not support the complainant that he detected footprints in the morning The complainant did not state That he saw the suspect in the hedge of his house set on fire, but the evidence was that he saw the suspect in the matchbox that the complainant described as having traced his foot. Because of the prints that transported them to the accused's house, it was clearly shown that the culprits were not seen or identified by the complainant, the suspects were very skeptical against the accused in the trial. Suspicions were raised, state counsel did not support the trial court's decision. , Under the circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous high court advocate from Tarnol lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.