Find a Lawyer

NESTLE MILKPAK LTD. versus SINDH INSTITUTE OF UROLOGY

Section 12 Easement Act, (V of 1882), Section 7 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), OXXIX, RR 1, 2, 4 & OI, R 8 and Section 151 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), section 39, 42 and a case of permanent injunction, declaration and annulment of documents. Claiming public interest in the land-transfer environment and the public's impact on the residents of the area for business benefits in the area specified for the City of Education Claimant / Respondent (Health and Educational Institution) filed against the Defendants / Appellants. The Declaration, Permanent Order and the Case Document Deletion, came to the effect that a specific area, designated as an Education City, would be established for the purpose of establishing health and educational institutions / projects and one of them. Must be specified. The defendants (water bottling company) had acquired 20 acres of land in Education City in a lawful manner, the defendants denied their claim. The plaintiff / company is running a water bottling plant on the disputed land so that it can use large quantities of underground water / water; This act by the plaintiff company may cause water shortages for future use by plaintiffs and other entities in the area. Defendant's plan is a violation of Section 12 of the Pakistan Environmental Protection Act 1997 and under which the defendant did not obtain any required permission under the canal and drainage Act 1873, on the other hand the defendant denied the claim of the plaintiff. Was. Any illegal movement by him to acquire 20 acres of land. The legality of the plaintiffs' title to their claimant land; the existence of an education city in the area; bottles of water on its 20 acres of land. solicitors from Cherat lawyer