Articles 302 (b), 109 and 34 Definition of Evidence Change of Motion Additional Judicial Confession Reliability Ocular Account Not Given Before Police Investigation Complainant has revealed in the FIR that the accused killed the brother in this suspicion It is believed that the sister of one of the deceased has developed illicit relations. During the police investigation trial court, the accused were found innocent, while relying on the testimony of a prosecutor, the accused was sentenced to life imprisonment. The accused was acquitted of a legal complaint. Submission before the trial court has changed its intended purpose from the person mentioned in the FIR. If the complainant had proved his motive in the FIR, he had to prove it on the same line as the FIR prosecution witness. I have been told that before this the accused did not present the extra-judicial confession offense. The court should confirm the accused's guilt. Such extra-judicial confession was of no value in the eyes of the prosecution witness who gave a general account of the events. Nor has it appeared to the police, nor has the statement been corroborated by the testimony of any other prosecutor. During the case, none of the witnesses of the complaint failed to present, the witnesses' statement, which did not appear before the police, was relied upon by the trial court while recording the punishment against the accused. Was acquitted and the other accused, acquitted by the trial court, was an unexpected event: prosecution of the accused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
