Find a Lawyer

IFTIKHAR AHMED ALIAS ALI versus STATE

Sections 6, 9, 36 (2) (1) and 47 Control of Drug Addicts (Government Analyst) Rules 2001, R6 Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Section 510 Report on Chemical Inspectors Narcotic Material Stances (Government) Analysts) under the Narcotic Sub-Metals Act, 1997 Scope 6, in the trial court for control of the Chemical Examiner effect CRPC under Section 36 (1) of the Rules, 2001 and the Drug Substances Control Act 1997 The case suffered. In the Control of Narcotic Material Stances Act, 1997, petitions were submitted to the trial court seeking a chemical inspector for cross-inspection purposes that the chemical inspector's report provided under Form 6 of the Narcotic Substances Control R6. Was not in accordance with Governmental Analyst (Rollins, 2001) and the report also lacked the necessary ingredients. The petitions were rejected by the trial court under section 47 of the Narcotics Substances Control Act 1997, its own Regulation for the Narcotic Materials to Act 1997. Regulated, provided that CCP section 510 also applied to the trial procedure under the Narcotic Materials Act 1997 under the CRPC, the Chemical Examiner's report was acceptable. Calling a witness without expert testimony, but without proving Section 1010T, the PC empowers the court that if he deems it necessary, he can summon and examine the person through whom. Such a report was prepared in section 36 (2) of the Narcotic Substance Act 1997, the inspector's report, without any proof of evidence, would be admissible and such evidence, unless denied. The final proof was to make sure that Kim solicitors from Khangarh lawyer