RAHIM SHAH versus DIN MUHMMAD THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS
The Su42 Declaration of Oral Sales Mutations challenged Ounce by the defendants to declare the oral sale mutation illegal, ineffective, and void on their rights. The plaintiff also filed a claim for declaratory and permanent injunction that he was the owner of the suit. Plaintiffs' suits were stable in the plaintiffs' trial The appellate court ruled that the plaintiffs' suits were upheld. The plaintiff had the same legality to petition the minority but failed to prove that sale was oral and the plaintiffs refused to prove the sale to Ones. The shopkeeper / beneficiary defendant was not presented to the Revenue Officer who was not presented to the witnesses who identified the plaintiff, only to testify to evidence that was not proved in the circumstances, the appellate court The judgment and order passed by were set aside. Trial court restored
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Nowshera Cantt lawyer
