Find a Lawyer

ABDUR REHMAN versus STATE

Section 302 (6) 134 Definition of Evidence The murder of the victim was disclosed which happened at night No witnesses were examined in the case The prosecution witnesses who had at last presented the evidence and the evidence of Wajitkar Had refused to express it clearly. While the trial court rejected his statements, the prosecutor himself had no motive against the accused, but relied on his extra-judicial confessions before some of the prosecution's witnesses, which it could have known. The victim was accused of having illicit relations with her sister. Brothers and it is unbelievable that on the same day he and his estranged father confessed their guilt before confessing to four different persons within a 100-km radius, four of the extra-court confession. The witnesses made contentious and contradictory statements and that could be the only case. Recovery of pistols and other not to be relied upon in other artificial artifacts was found to be suspicious on the occasion, besides the dismissal by the accused, whose recovery witnesses, both related to the deceased, were extra-judicial and final. Already denied in relation to the evidence seen. And they could not be easily relied on in connection with the recovery, which would otherwise have been subject to various defects. immigration advocates phone number from Sargodha lawyer