LAKHMEER AHMAD versus STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 364 and 201 bail, further investigation grant accused, who was an old man of about 70 years old, was not named in the FIR directly. There was no evidence the person was identified and, according to the person, the co-accused identified the place from which the defamatory articles were recovered, rather than the suspect saying the recovery was allegedly made from the home of the co-accused. The deceased had a real son and who saw his father sitting in the car of the co-accused in a horrific condition, did not even ask his father for fear and he started 18 inquiries about his deceased father. Why spend hours that were available with the available material Section 497 (1), the offense charged with the CRPC invoice or the prohibition clause presented, or the defendant guilty of associating it with a crime punishable by death, first fax The prosecution was not enough. The commencement of the trial will not preclude the court from extending the privileges of bail, unless otherwise the accused was entitled to the same, in the case of the accused under strange facts and circumstances under section (2) of 5 of 497. There was further investigation. Under the circumstances, the bail was filed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Makli lawyer