Find a Lawyer

UMAR HAYAT versus MUHAMMAD ASGHAR ALI

Section 497 (5) Appeal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 295 8, 436, 452, 427, 337H (2), 148 and 9149 Applicants to cancel the bail application / Applicant has already approved the respondents Demanded cancellation of the guaranteed bail. The accused, mainly on the basis of his release on bail, appeared before the trial court on some dates and then without any justification to delay the trial court's trial order sheet attached to the application. Presented to you Bail pre-arrest warrants have been issued against the defendant / accused and the trial court was fully authorized to cause his arrest for not appearing in his court and against it, section 87 and, Action can be taken against the CRPC under the confiscation of bail bonds. And the CRPC can set aside his case under his 512, issuing an unsecured warrant against the defendant / accused in the trial, was already declared a guilty complaint of the applicant / complainant, more here There was no need to take action under which the petition was dealt with. \ R \ n property advocates from Digri lawyer