Find a Lawyer

AZIM KHAN versus MUHAMMAD AKBAR

A. XXVI, R 10 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 42 and 54 of the Constitutional Petition for the Declaration of the Case and Permanent Order of the Local Commission Report to the Local Commissioner After proper investigation and has been appointed for appointment. The inquiry Pat, in the presence of Patwari Halga and the parties in this case, prepared a detailed and comprehensive report, which was neither open to exemption nor the lawyer's statement to local applicants, was incomplete, ineffective and The commissioners failed to resolve. The actual dispute between the parties, without a positive attempt to prove it, did not result, O XXVI, R 10 (2), under CPC, the commissioner's report by which the court Commission was issued, it was to be treated. As evidenced in this case, although it was not binding on the court to reach its conclusion based on the evidence on record, the orders of the courts below were not shown to have been illegal or irregularly defected. In the presence of any interference in the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court was not permissible. \ r \ n \ r \ n us immigration advocates from Deh Pathaan lawyer