Find a Lawyer

ARIF versus STATE

Sections 2 (30 (b), 47 F and 7 337 F (iv)) of the testimony of the complainant as the original uncle of the accused had no reason to trap him and substitute him with the original culprit. The presence of the complainant cannot be doubted on the occasion of the incident. The only witness among the four eyewitnesses who suffered a firearm injury during the incident was the complainant accused of death and He was injured in the fire arm on his left knee. The complainant's statement was confirmed by other witnesses. The same should be preferred over medical evidence, which was more than writings and was tampered with at various places, the crime scene was collected by chance, according to the forensic science laboratory. Was recovered from the defendant's verbal defense claim without confirming it through documentary evidence, which could not affect the prosecutors' competence. Could not allege the charges, he himself molested the victim by molesting and humiliating him without cause. What was the case and later took his life and injured his old uncle for no reason, the criminal record of the accused and his disappointing nature prevented him from any kind of punishment in the matter of punishment and the accused. Punishment and punishment were maintained under the circumstances divorce advocates from Khushal Kot lawyer