Find a Lawyer

WISAL MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Arts 3 and 4 Drug Control Substance (Government Analyst) Rules, 2001, Rr 4 and 5 Criminal Code (V9 1898), Section 103 Delay in sending samples complimenting evidence Recovery of drug laboratory effects (Government) Analyst (Rules), 2001 prohibits the investigating officer from sending samples more than the last two hours, receiving a forensic report after 15 days, and presenting this report to the trial court language in the rules and regulations. Was not imposed. The effects of the infringement were provided in it, they created a directory of rules and did not necessarily say that the Seoul Rules did not control and enforce the basic provisions of the Narcotic Substances Act, 1997. Let the action not frustrate the purpose of this Act. Under which the failure to follow them was stated that the rules would not provide for search, seizure and arrest under the Code of Conduct Act 1997. n make the whole issue of absolute and unsatisfactory and prudent, except where the Regulation states that compliance is sufficient in the directory provisions, and even where there was no compliance, such compliance The action was not invalidated, unless the law was complied with by law or otherwise in the absence of any objection to the expert's opinion in sending articles to the relevant quarter. I cannot be fatalistic that sending samples for over seventy analyzes. Two hours and the report received was illegal and the occupation was declared invalid in the eyes of the law, elled r \ n property advocate from Okara lawyer