KHALID MAHMOOD versus STATE
Section 497 Preamble Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 365, 392, 395 and 412 bail, although the defendant was not named in the FIR, he was involved in the case on the basis of the complainant's supplementary statement. Said that there is nothing in the piece of evidence though. The legal cleanser, but the accused, after his arrest, was also put into the parade test and identified by the witnesses as a loot money was also recovered from the accused, sufficient evidence to meet the accused Prima. Was on the record. The commission of an offense under the Prohibited Clause of Section 749 Cr
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Yazman Mandi lawyer
