MESSRS SUPER METAL TRADERS, THROUGH PROPRIETOR versus GENERAL MANAGER, PAKISTAN RAILWAY, LAHORE AND 2 OTHERS
Section 203 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition has been filed claiming that the customs authorities refused to approve the goods imported by them and detained that the petitioners in issuing clearance certificate. Delay is due to customs. Authorities, he was responsible for paying storage charges at the lowest rates, railway officials had requested that the applicant have no right to receive low tariffs during the period of storage of imported goods. ? First, because it did not receive an order from the customs authorities. And second, the railways were not to be blamed for the delay, but in this case, the bridges taken by the railways were not declared Germany. The rules held by the High Courts recognize the importer's right to be stored at a lower level and are charged with damages in cases where the delay in approval of the imported goods was attributed to the customs authorities, directing the railway It was requested to collect the storage charges from the applicant at the minimum tariff rate.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Gari Habibullah lawyer