The Section 497 Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 393 and 34 guarantees, the defendant was identified as an accused who participated in the incident and who was the victim at the time of the incident. Was the trial of this case. The trial was already started for recording the evidence and three witnesses were present, but the defense lawyer chose not to examine them and was not accused of delaying the petition, but rather the accused and his lawyer. Cited because despite the presence of witnesses, the defense lawyer was not ready to investigate them and their evidence could not be recorded. The argument that the investigations were not conducted properly and the factual facts were not brought to the police records would be reviewed by the trial court after recording the evidence. The profound merits of the case fell within the scope of Article 497, the CR PC Prohibition Clause and no scope could be made. Bail bail applications were rejected
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
