Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD JAVED versus STATE


Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 381, 420, 468 and 471 bail, the accused of further inquiry accused of forging the signature of the chief executive officer of the company Rs 2,10,000 Has withdrawn the amount of The accused's grandfather returned the money in full in the dispute The investigating officer admitted that he did not obtain the accused's signature on comparing the check with the signed signatures, there was no step for the accused to be falsely accused. The case of the accused was raised. The further inquiry offense with which the accused was charged has fallen outside the prohibited provisions of section 497, the CCP suspect admitted on bail.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous high court advocate from Tando Jam lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.