Find a Lawyer

WALAYAT BIBI ALIAS RANI versus LIAQAT ALI ALIAS FAYAZ AHMAD

Article 42 of the Qunun Martyrdom (1984, of 1984), Arts 11 64, ?? 11 and ?? title Declaration of Comparative Relations was declared to invalidate the principle of ounce change and do not read the error. Assumed that they were the sole legal heirs of the deceased owner. The trial court and the appellate court jointly dismissed the case and the appeal filed by the plaintiffs on behalf of the plaintiffs was that they offered to establish any relationship of the defendants with the deceased owner of the suit land. The evidence was presented through false statements. Under the jurisdiction of the two courts, all the persons produced by the plaintiff were close relatives of the family and they stated that the defendant's mother was not married to the deceased owner of the suit land and the defendant was not the victim's son. There was no effective crossing on such witnesses. The deceased owner's wife was the real sister of the defendant's mother, who denied the marriage at all. Her sister failed to have any close relatives with her husband, the defendant's family or anyone with special means. , Which can state that the defendant is the son of the deceased owner No evidence was provided on record by the defendant - from the fact that the defendant's mother has ever married the defendant's mother is an important present in this case. After the evidence of the plaintiff and the plaintiff, the burden was on the defendants to prove it, but they failed. And they did not have any positive evidence of marriage. Oral and documentary evidence which the courts below did not consider in their proper context, the following two cases: best law firms from Dandot lawyer