Find a Lawyer

KAMRAN AHMED versus STATE

Section 497 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 392 bail, denied the accused's conviction that his case was another inquiry because, according to the statement of the prosecution witness listed under Section 161, CR P.C. All four accused were on fire. Weapons, however, according to the FIR, only two of them were equipped with a pistol and because of this it was not appealed that the suspects were walking in the same car six days after his recovery, The cause requires a deep appreciation of the material. Available on record and the accused's case was not forwarded for sanction of bail, especially when serious allegations were made against him that the pocket computer was recovered from the accused and his legal status was identified as a prosecution witness. Has already been presented in court. Guaranteed, Section 497 (1), CCPC's prohibiting clause cannot be allowed in the case when the accused who is substantially involved in the matter was first present against him. Accused her of linking him to a crime The bail application was dismissed criminal advocate from Jalal Pur Jatan lawyer