Find a Lawyer

INAYAT MASIH versus AZHAR MAHMOOD

The specific performance of the contract to sell Section 12 execution fraud was alleged by Lux Standard defendant that he never agreed to sell his land to the plaintiff, that the plaintiff had signed and signed the fingerprint paper. And later turned it into a sales contract. And that he did not receive the money, the oral evidence presented by the plaintiff was allegedly written by one witness and signed by another, not entered in the register where various documents were written. , They did not belong to the claimant's village. The appellate court took notice of natural human behavior to identify her, contradicting the petitions and the evidence in the file, stating that the document was framed by fraud by the plaintiff as a plaintiff. The decision cannot be made based on the alleged sale agreement. There was no locus standi and there was no reason, therefore, his case was false and illegal. We were reversed by the trial court, and the trial court's decision and ruling were set aside and the plaintiff's. The case was excluded from special costs. property advocate from Sakardu lawyer