The appeal against the charge of breach of Article 417 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 451 and 342 was that he entered the complainant's house, attacked the complainant and urged him to go to the police station and On resistance, the accused abused his wife and daughter. Evidence from the evidence on the complaint has revealed that the complainant and the prosecution witness did not know the accused who committed adultery in their house, hid the women of the house, took them to the police station and kept them for several hours. The complainant in the absence of the accused came to the house of the accused; he did not know the prisoners of the house, the women who were taken to the police station where they were imprisoned. Was upheld, appeal against the verdict was dismissed \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
