Find a Lawyer

ABDUL MAJEED versus STATE

Section 302 (b) and 395 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (a) Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 17 (4) Definition of Evidence An Extraordinary Day Event There was enough time for witnesses to identify the suspect that the identity parade was being conducted under the supervision of the Tehsildar with the powers of the Magistrate Third Class because there was no strict and sharp rule that the Supervision of Identity Parade was conducted by the Magistrate. Should have first-class options, even two notable ones identified by the Vice-Chancellor with the third-class magistrate powers in the area Checking the parade and as a member of the three members of the dmyun in the presence of their presence in the presence of witnesses and other prosecution witnesses identify and signed the memo. A lengthy investigation was conducted, but no contradiction was made on the record that damaged the identity value of the equivalent of the show. There was nothing on the record to show that the witnesses had any hostility to the allegations. In this case, the witnesses were advised of any misconduct for the false execution of the accused and the witnesses correctly identified the accused and they had no evidence to falsely implicate the witnesses directly, Were natural and credible, their testimony was unanimous, and there was no material contradiction or improvement which led to The asthma incident was damaged and a vacancy was collected from the scene, and Kalashnikov was sent to a specialist for inspection, whose report was positive. And the certified account as well as the prosecution of the accused in court how to become a advocate from Chak 4 b c lawyer