Find a Lawyer

DHANI BAKHSH versus STATE

Sections 7 (b) and 21H of the Explosive Substances Act (VI of 1908), Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 164 of the Law on Martyrs (10 of 1984), Article 40 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) ), Arts 13 (b) and 25 evidences of appreciation The confessional statements filed by the police officer under Section 21H of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 are against Art 13 (b) and 25, which were identified in the parade. The FIR is not delayed. Based on the effectiveness of the statements recorded by police officer Scope Complainant Police Officer, an FIR was registered against a bomb on a railway track against three unidentified suspects when policemen detonated a bomb from there. Was removed as a result of which the policemen were injured / appellant. The suspects were later arrested and identified by the police constable, according to which the accused on the railway track allegedly recorded his confessional statements under Section 160, CR. As a District Police Officer before the PC, the trial court sentenced the convict and sentenced the accused to life imprisonment. Thirteen days after the arrest of the accused, an identity parade was held and no explanation was offered for the delay in holding the identity parade. In the prosecution's case, the prosecution's witness, who allegedly identified the accused, did not support the prosecution and was neither declared admissible in Marsala nor was it mentioned in the FIR There were not three suspected bombers who did not know who the suspects were. At the semblance of identification of the accused or the witness identifying the accused immigration advocates email from Chiniot lawyer