Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HANAN versus STATE

Section 302 (b) Validation of Evidence Defendant's statements of witnesses, letters to each other, the residence of all three witnesses relating to the day, time and place of the incident involving firearms by the deceased and his death. The fact that the incident occurred made him a natural witness, and to the extent that it could not be doubted, neither did the defense challenge the defendant's presence in his home at the relevant time and the person involved in the incident. Was denied, but the defendant's efforts in this regard were unsuccessful; statements from the prosecution's witnesses may be used to identify the accused. Do not move because the accused knew them as the nephew of a prosecution witness and the husband of another prosecutor's witness. All told that the witnesses did not make statements of the prosecution witnesses to the accused in light of the electric bulb; on the night of the incident, when he entered the house, he left no room for suspecting the suspect's presence. After taking a pistol and causing him fatal injuries, he escaped and after a month's incident he failed to provide any explanation, the nature of the alleged variations of the time of the deceased being brought to the hospital. That could end the statements of the prosecution's witnesses, who, despite thorough scrutiny, They may not trigger the event was delayed recording is set, the statement of a witness, the prosecution showed FIR. Cannot be considered fatal by the Investigation Officer when there is clarity in this regard, the prosecution's testimony, along with the legal evidence and the accused's fugitive, online advocate from Khangarh lawyer