Find a Lawyer

MST. ASMA USMAN versus SYED ADIL HUSSAIN

Article 15 (vii) and 21 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Landowner's Own Landlord With his Lawyer Extracting Tenants from Three Stores for the Use of His Daughter and Two Sons Application was filed. Petitioners and tenants were ordered to evacuate from three shops, but the appellate court rejected the eviction orders and dismissed the withdrawal request. The estate attorney who filed the eviction requests through Land Maldi had husband and daughter's father and two sons who were required to purchase the landlord with virtual eviction requests filed by a lawyer / husband. If the landlord / landlord would like to evict the tenants from the rental premises on the basis that it was necessary for his / her sons / daughters to use them personally for good, then such sons and daughters should be included. Can't be The requirement that the premises be submitted to the court by the individual and his / her parent is sufficient to substantiate the demand that the landlord own a tenant to consolidate it for their respective personal use. No restrictions can be imposed against a tenant upon request. The tenants were arrested for the personal use of their children after the shops were removed in question, the landlord intended to release a large amount of turban, etc. The tenants' well-being was not justified in view of the fact that the rights of the tenants were protected / protected under the provisions of Section 15A of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979. lawer from fb area from Kacha Khooh lawyer