BABAR YOUNUS versus STATE
Section 497 Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), Sections 33, 37A, 46 and 66 Sales Tax Return Rules, 2002, R8 (1) guarantee, refund claim claim, tax fraud case, There was a registration of the Investigating Officer. Because of the absence of the supplier and the inability of the diagnostic staff to assess the tax fraud, the Commission Investigation Officer has not taken any evidence to show that the supplier did not collect or collect the cover tax through the invoices. Was not calculated. Recovery of goods through goods and in foreign exchange was not denied by the prosecution. Assisi's claim of repatriation is pending and no dismissal notice of dismissal or prosecution was submitted. Purchase was not made on credit via SCSSI Prohibited tax fraud cannot be treated with confession because SCCC was in custody for more than 1/2 month. Five years imprisonment or fine or both state did not suffer any loss of income.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Thatta lawyer
