Find a Lawyer

MALIK MUHAMMAD SAEED versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Sections 16, 17, 32, 156 (9) (14), 169 and 217 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 and 54 of the Customs General Order No. 19/98, dated 799 1998, Section RO 599 (I). In respect of the arrival of the plaintiff in Pakistan under the Housing Scheme for Transfer of Declaration and Permanent Order of Prohibition (a Pakistani Citizen) for the Decree and Permanent Order of Decree 3, 1993, on the date of entry of the Bill 174 1997, date 15 7. Was showing car shipment in 1998. 28 In the 1998 Decree, the Authority approved that after the plaintiff's arrival in Pakistan for 60 days, the duty for the shipment of the vehicles was fined and the fine was imposed. Accuracy Customs authorities have the option of checking whether the vehicle has been imported in accordance with Section RO. 599 (1) / 93 or not, such vehicle may be immediately confiscated in accordance with Customs General Order 19/98, as per Section 17 of the Impound Procedure Customs Act, 1969 by the authorities on 7-9 1998. Had been imported and violated 5% due to no vehicles. 9 His appeal to the High Court was available to the plaintiff, where he could protest the pleas raised by him in the present case. Was, the designated action protected under Section 217 of the Customs Act 1969, thus, was not open to challenge before the Civil Court, which could not be set aside or amended. I could not keep the conditions and have not been rejected \ r \ n \ r \ n Pakistan, top advocate family court from Diamer lawyer