Find a Lawyer

MIRZA MUHAMMAD AQEEL versus MIRZA MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN

Article 199 Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), retaining section 5A & 54 Constitution Petition The sale agreement was denied respondent's request to enforce the sale agreement in favor of the applicant, record Following the appropriate definition on the proof of, is as follows. The facts against the applicant were simultaneously discovered that the alleged sale agreement was not executed by the respondents in favor of the applicant and in the applicant's case the trial court was conditioned on arbitration and It was necessary to use discretion with it. The two courts below used the explicit adjournment to deny applicants the adjusted interim relief, which is because the constitutional petition is not enforceable against the conclusions of the courts below and the High Court does not have the power to Alternate your search by searching for tribunals below using the options. In the absence of any weakness or illegal procedure in the involuntary orders of the courts below the statute under Article 199 of the Mine, the Constitutional Jurisdiction cannot be interfered with by the High Court. lawer from fb area from Sakrand lawyer