Find a Lawyer

SHAUKAT ALI ALIAS BILLA versus STATE

Definition of Section 9 (C) Evidence The Inspector Anti-Narcotic Force prepared a report on the basis of which the formal FIR was prepared and gave a detailed statement as stated in the report, the inspector completed the second witness testimony of the prosecution. Backed by the investigation, revealed that he had recorded the first version of the accused on the spot and denied the suggestion that the accused had requested that he buy two dinner sets through the informant. Instead of providing dinner sets, she kept drugs in her house. Section 2342, in its statement under CRPC, was taken up by the accused, but did not present any evidence in support of his request. Witness's testimony was not suggested for any purpose. After making false allegations, the inspector said he tried to lure residents of the area during the raid, but he denied that it could not be expected that a large quantity of the narcotics was used against the accused. Recovered, the fact that no search warrant was obtained prior to the raid, will not be recovered because the evidence provided by the prosecutor's witnesses has obtained a full credibility report of the chemical. Was told that the substance recovered from the possession of the accused was a case of four against the accused. It is beyond doubt and there is no reason to seek any concession; a large quantity of marijuana was recovered from the possession of the accused. best advocate from Haroonabad lawyer