Find a Lawyer

NOOR-UL-HASSAN versus STATE

Non-Production Impact of Birth Certificate of Medical Board Opinion on Section 7 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 148 and 149 of the Adolescent Court's Certificate of Omitting School Leave Certificate Accused / Applicants The case was registered under (two real brothers). Section 2302, PPC and his challan were submitted to the trial court, the accused filed a petition before the trial court and his case was claimed under the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000, because of his At the time of his presence and support, he was under 18 years of age. His claim relied on a school leaving certificate after the defendant filed another petition before the trial court for a medical board to determine his age, the medical board said, adding that the accused's age was 20/21, respectively. Year and 21/22 years before the trial court dismissed the accused's plea. The juvenile court heard that the medical board's opinion should be given priority over the school record, not the entire truth of the school record was above the board, the defendant then filed another application before the court and The trial court dismissed the petition on the basis of his request for a medical examination through the Regional Appellate Medical Board to determine his age. The Medical Board believes the suspects were over 18 at the time of their presence. That the court cannot review the defendant's accuracy based on the reports presented by the Medical Board on the first order passed by the trial court on the previous application, which instead of dismissing the accused as their accused, K immigration advocates contact from Digri lawyer