Section 526 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Case Transfer / Complainant requested transfer of the case to another court on the ground that the accused's brother was publicly expressing that the petitioner was under investigation The accused has been acquitted by a trial judge. It was ambiguous for the transfer of the case because neither the court nor any institution could prevent a party from expressing anything if such an expression hindered the judicial proceedings or improperly shadowed the judge or disqualified the judge. , Then the party had the right to refer the relevant court to initiate contempt proceedings against such person; then the points can be properly examined whether the person said such words. Whether or not the brother of the accused had conveyed to the applicant the words that were stated by the applicant. So they must have been heard by many who submitted the petitioners. Witnesses said they testified to prove the allegation, but the applicant had not filed an affidavit of such person to support his accusation, there was no scope for a trial transfer, transferring the case. Request for was dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
