Find a Lawyer

MESSRS PAKISTAN CABLES LTD. THROUGH FINANCE DIRECTOR AND COMPANY SECRETARY versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH CHAIRMAN, C.B.R. AND 2 OTHERS

Section 19 and 223 are reported on the basis of a letter issued by the Central Board of Revenue Petitioner, exemption from payment of Article R3535 (1) / 2002, Article 15 6 2002 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application. Based on a letter issued by an official of the Polypropylene Central Board of Revenue, Fuller asserted the benefit of notification section R358 (I) / 2002 under the head of the PCT, 5607 4900, on December 15, 2002. , Because this content was not locally produced. The petitioner's plea taken by the applicant was denied to benefit from the notification that the Customs General Order, issued by section 223 of the Central Board of Revenue's Customs Act, 1969, was issued by the Engineering Development Board Petitioner. Cannot reject by letter. The goods imported by them were not included in the list of locally manufactured goods which were approved by the Indian Committee for the purpose of the Lawsuit Section RO 357 (I) / 2002, dated 15 6 2002, Goods should not be manufactured locally which were not included in the list of locally produced items prepared by the Central Board of Revenue in consultation with the Ministry. An industry letter written by the Engineering Development Board, unless and until the Central Board of Revenue and the item is included in the list of locally produced goods, proceeding to revoke the privilege under section R357 (I). Should not be done 2002, dated 15 6 2002 The polypropylene filler (PCT Heading 5607 4900) was not locally manufactured and the authorities were not authorized to deny concessions. divorce advocates from Tando Adam lawyer