MST. MARIUM versus STATE
Section 497 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 16 Bail, Counsel's grant for the accused claimed that the filing of the FIR was not only delayed by about 20 days , But the prosecution also failed to cite the witness. Or eyewitness to the alleged incident. The dispute was between the complainant and his alleged abducted wife, who filed a lawsuit against the complainant to dissolve the marriage and also sought refuge / protection of the premises and since the accused complainant's wife And the complaint against it was forwarded to the Inspector General. The police, the complainant, allegedly seeking revenge, had made a fabricated statement against the accused and the other co-accused State Council did not oppose the bail approval of the accused in view of the position filed by the accused's lawyer. ? In the case of bail, he was admitted on bail accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Daulat Pur lawyer